Anmore South Community Engagement

The Anmore South lands are owned by icona Properties Ltd., and icona's current application to amend Anmore's Official Community Plan (OCP) and develop a Neighbourhood Plan for the area respresent a significant change to Anmore's future growth and development. Formerly known as the Imperial Oil Company (IOCO) lands, Anmore South encompasses 151 acres in the southern part of Anmore.

The OCP Amendment Application was submitted on May 5, 2023 and it reflects a mixed-use community at Anmore South phased over a 25-year period, including retained forest and natural areas, an interconnected parks and trail network, commercial businesses, community facilities and a diversity of housing. The application includes 3,100- 3,500 homes with a projected population of 5,100 to 6,700 residents.

At the Regular Council Meeting on December 5, 2023, Council gave first reading to the Official Community Plan (OCP) Amendment Bylaw No. 686-2023, which relates to icona Properties Ltd.’s application for the Anmore South lands. First reading starts a comprehensive exploratory process to consider the amendment and what it means to Anmore. On March 19, 2024, Council approved the Terms of Reference that will guide the development of the Neighbourhood Plan for the area.

Council also endorsed a Community Engagement Plan for the Anmore South OCP Amendment Application and Neighbourhood Plan.


Complete the Neighbourhood Plan Workshop Feedback Form

If you missed the workshops, you can still provide your input on the Workshop Feedback Form. Click on the Feedback Form June 2024 tab below to provide your input on the following topics:

  • Housing forms and choices
  • Traffic and transportation
  • Parks and natural areas
  • Shops, services and facilities
  • Share perspectives on the future of Anmore South

Please complete the Feedback Form by June 30, 2024.

The following technical studies were presented at the Technical Open House on June 25, 2024:

For background information about the Anmore South OCP Amendment Bylaw No. 686-2023, the Neighbourhood Plan terms of reference and other details related to the Anmore South lands, please visit the Anmore South project page.


The Anmore South lands are owned by icona Properties Ltd., and icona's current application to amend Anmore's Official Community Plan (OCP) and develop a Neighbourhood Plan for the area respresent a significant change to Anmore's future growth and development. Formerly known as the Imperial Oil Company (IOCO) lands, Anmore South encompasses 151 acres in the southern part of Anmore.

The OCP Amendment Application was submitted on May 5, 2023 and it reflects a mixed-use community at Anmore South phased over a 25-year period, including retained forest and natural areas, an interconnected parks and trail network, commercial businesses, community facilities and a diversity of housing. The application includes 3,100- 3,500 homes with a projected population of 5,100 to 6,700 residents.

At the Regular Council Meeting on December 5, 2023, Council gave first reading to the Official Community Plan (OCP) Amendment Bylaw No. 686-2023, which relates to icona Properties Ltd.’s application for the Anmore South lands. First reading starts a comprehensive exploratory process to consider the amendment and what it means to Anmore. On March 19, 2024, Council approved the Terms of Reference that will guide the development of the Neighbourhood Plan for the area.

Council also endorsed a Community Engagement Plan for the Anmore South OCP Amendment Application and Neighbourhood Plan.


Complete the Neighbourhood Plan Workshop Feedback Form

If you missed the workshops, you can still provide your input on the Workshop Feedback Form. Click on the Feedback Form June 2024 tab below to provide your input on the following topics:

  • Housing forms and choices
  • Traffic and transportation
  • Parks and natural areas
  • Shops, services and facilities
  • Share perspectives on the future of Anmore South

Please complete the Feedback Form by June 30, 2024.

The following technical studies were presented at the Technical Open House on June 25, 2024:

For background information about the Anmore South OCP Amendment Bylaw No. 686-2023, the Neighbourhood Plan terms of reference and other details related to the Anmore South lands, please visit the Anmore South project page.


Submit Questions/Comments

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • I was advised at last nights technical session that a "task-force" has been developed to discuss roads / transportation. This task force currently consists of the land-owner and Port Moody - it was not made clear who from Port Moody. Can more information be provided please as to who is on the task force, and at what point will the task force open up to include current residents who will be affected by traffic.

    LisaJ asked 8 days ago

    The task force you are referencing was initiated by icona as part of its OCP Amendment Application, which noted the need for a a more coordinated approach to address transportation concerns as they go beyond Anmore’s borders. The task force is being led by a professional transportation expert, Geoff Cross, former VP of Planning for TransLink. The task force includes representatives from Icona and Gillic Development (property owners of Anmore South and the IOCO lands in Port Moody), Esso (the property owner of the Imperial Oil industrial lands in Port Moody that border Anmore) and several organizations, including the TriCity Chamber of Commerce, TransLink and the Port of Vancouver. Representatives from affected local governments in the area and Metro Vancouver have also participated in some of the meetings.

    We have been advised by icona that a perspective paper summarizing the task force's discussions and findings will be released soon and will be shared with the community. It is anticipated that this document will include information on overall land use planning and strategies for the larger area - not just what is being considered in Anmore. This includes factors such as the provincial government's plans to decommission Burrard Thermal and the Port of Vancouver's requirement for additional port-enabling industrial land. 

     

  • The Fiscal Impact Analysis was just a copy of one done for Icona a few years ago. I wanted to ask about the policing costs, but that expert wasn’t there. Apparently he is only contracted to write a new report in Phase 3. So the info about this open house wasn’t accurate. I wanted to inquire about the projected policing costs of $742,000. Looking at other towns in BC who have grown to just over 5000 in population they have had to hire 5-8 officers (we would need double that?), support staff, build a detachment etc. way more than $742,000. But “wait until phase 3” for answers. https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/city-of-duncan-to-pay-for-policing-costs-as-population-surpasses-5-000-1.5787373 ,

    LS asked 8 days ago

    Thank you for your interest in the Anmore South OCP Amendment Application and Neighbourhood Plan development process. As you noted, the Technical Open House studies being presented are part of Phase 1 of this process, which means the studies reflect baseline information related to the application submitted to the Village. As more information is confirmed, including the preferred land use scenarios that are being developed as part of Phase 2 and the Neighbourhood Plan in Phase 3, there will be more details about what is being proposed. This more detailed information is needed for the assessments you are requesting, such as financial implications. We recognize that our residents are interested in more details such as the projected costs for policing, and this will be part of the Phase 3 studies, which will be shared with the community.

  • Is there any legal (or otherwise) reason why Icona would not be able to use Anmore's available CD zoning for Anmore South? If yes, please state why. If no, then is there any legal (or otherwise) reason why Anmore Council cannot suggest that Icona explore that option? If it is an available option why does Anmore Council refuse to acknowledge that it exists and is available for use by Icona, just as the one acre option is. A variation of CD zoning is a viable option that everyone could work with.

    HKoit asked 13 days ago

    We have responded to your questions about the infill/CD zone previously, and we have noted your preferences as part of this community engagement process. If you would like to discuss your preferences further, we encourage you to participate in the community engagement discussions or submit a written response with what you would like to see in terms of future development of Anmore South. Village staff members involved in this planning process are also available to meet with you by phone or in person if you prefer to share your input that way.

  • Regarding my last posting: I am not asking where I can provide input. I am asking where I can get answers. I am asking when our Council is going to discuss the third viable option, cd zoning, which Icona does not acknowledge. If Icona will only discuss one acre zoning or high density urban-then it is up to our Council to inform citizens that there is another choice that falls between these two extremes that might be the right fit to keep Anmore growing and changing, but at a rate that doesn't swamp us. It is time that Council (not Icona) reviewed some of the basics with its citizens because there are a lot of very confused people who obviously have a poor understanding of what Anmore South is all about-what is real and what is hypothetical, what is already decided and what isn't. Council MUST give us ALL pertinent information so that we can make an informed decision. *I did not see any further information where you indicated regarding the public hearing. I would like to know why it is so far ahead in the proceedings and what form it will take. *please post information about the studies done for the Technical Open House. Are they up-to-date? Who commissioned them? who carried them out? who paid for them? *will there be a public referendum regarding Anmore South at any time in the proceedings or will the final decision regarding Anmore South be decided by Anmore Council.

    HKoit asked 14 days ago

    As we have advised previously, Council is considering the OCP amendment application as submitted by icona as the property owner. As the property owner, icona has the right to apply for the type of development it wants to pursue.  The Village is not doing an assessment of infill/CD zones as the property owner has not submitted an application for that type of zoning. We have noted your input that you would like Council to consider an infill/CD zone instead, and this will be added to the consideration of community input. 

    We have already shared the information about when Public Hearing fits into this process (between 2nd and 3rd reading of the bylaw), and it will follow standard Public Hearing regulatory requirements. No date is set as a significant amount of work - including additional community engagement - is taking place before 2nd reading is considered by Council. We have noted that you want a Public Hearing and would prefer to see it sooner in the process. 

    We have noted that you want more information shared with the community, and we will be continuing to do so through the community engagement process. 

    The Technical Open House will include some studies that were completed previously and a couple new studies, such as the Archeological Impact Assessment and Environmental Baseline Assessment. The other studies are largely the same as previously presented. The Technical Open House is being offered to provide community members with the opportunity to review the studies if they have not previously done so, and to come and meet with the subject matter experts in person to ask questions. 

    The dates of the studies are as follows:
    • Physical Inventory and Analysis | June 2024
    • Community Facilities Inventory | June 2024
    • Existing Engineering Inventory | June 2024
    • Geotechnical Investigation Report | November 2023
    • Environmental Baseline Assessment | February 2024
    • Archaeological Impact Assessment | April 2024
    • Phase 1 Transportation Study | June 2024
    • Retail Market Analysis | May 2024
    • OCP Application Fiscal & Economic Impact Analysis | November 2021
  • You need to build a third road before you have any more humans living here. ARE YOU BUILDING A THIRD ROAD ?????

    Evelyn Spring asked 18 days ago

    The more detailed Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) is being completed in the fall as part of the Phase 3 of the Neighbourhood Planning process. This study will be based on the land use scenarios being developed in the coming months, which are being informed by the current community engagement and Phase 1 technical studies. The TIA will determine the impacts and infrastructure requirements of the Neighbourhood Plan at full build-out on the existing road network.  

  • It has been mentioned, more than once, that if we as residents, do not allow a change to our current RS-1 zoning, Anmore South will be clear-cut. I'd like to point out the many one-acre parcels already in Anmore, as well as smaller than one acre, which are not clear-cut. Ravenswood, Countryside, Anmore Green Estates, Birch Wynde, all offer various housing options with varying price-tags - and are NOT clear-cut. All have trees, greenery, shrubs, friendly people, homes for our firefighters, health-care workers and more. All the neighbourhoods contain trees. It is not an absolute that Anmore needs to allow Anmore South to deviate from the current RS-1 Zoning. Current infill ability allows some RS-1 lots to subdivide - allowing potentially 3 - 1/3 acre lots, each with a house. Our own village has been working to solidify it's coach/carriage house needs, which also allows for more housing on one-acre parcels, for example a secondary suite in main house, and a coach / carriage house on the same property. There are other options allowing the Village of Anmore to increase housing. There can be varying housing opportunities, created within our current RS-1 zoning - we need to stop the fear mongering of clear-cut monster houses as our only option. Does it make sense to think that we won't see clearcut for towers, or apartments? For roadways and facilities? For the ability to get service and delivery trucks in? All and any type of growth is going to cause the destruction of the current forest - its a fact. It is up to the Village of Anmore to uphold the 20% coverage tree bylaws, and enforce this on all new build. RS-1 zoning, with enforced bylaws in place DOES NOT MEAN CLEARCUT and does NOT have to mean MONSTER HOMES

    LisaJ asked 19 days ago

    It is first important to note that icona has not applied for condensed development (CD) zones or infill, which is why Council is not currently considering these options. As the property owner, icona has the right to apply for the type of development it wants to pursue. 

    When an application comes in, Council is obliged to consider what is being proposed. Because the current application is for a development with a mix of housing that includes higher density, it requires an amendment to the OCP. Council gave first reading to this amendment which started the process for reviewing the application - not other forms of development. 

    We are not yet at the stage where zoning is determined - that comes next if the OCP amendment and Neighbourhood Plan are approved. Icona does have a subdivision application in place under the current zoning. The current assessments being done compare the two land use options that icona has put forward for its land. In general, an RS-1 development will result in more loss of trees and green space than a higher density development. 

    If icona proceeds with a subdivision application under the existing RS-1 zoning, the 151 acres on this property would accommodate approximately 85, one-acre lots that would be developed with single-detached homes. This would involve development on approximately 75% of the land area for residential uses. Environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., riparian areas along streams) would be protected, there is the 20% coverage required through the Tree Management Bylaw and 5% of the area must be set aside for green space, but the rest of the area would be developed. 

    While the Village enforces the Tree Management Bylaw to preserve 20% of coverage on lots, this does not necessarily mean existing trees must remain – they can be removed and replaced. Preserving existing trees is always a priority; however, when building a new development of this scope (as opposed to just adding one home to a lot in an existing developed area) involves more than adding homes – there are roads, water services and other infrastructure that also have to be built. This means that many of the existing trees often need to be removed and are replaced after development to meet bylaw requirements. 

    As well, the 20% of required tree cover for RS-1 can be spread out over all of the development area – not all in one block of trees. 

    Under the current OCP Amendment Application, the proposal is for a mix of housing that includes multi-unit complexes like townhomes and apartments. It would result in development of approximately 52% of the land area for streets and residential uses, with the remaining area used for neighbourhood parks, a community centre and natural areas. This would nearly double the area for environmental preservation including existing biodiversity that rely on the intact environment. When larger portions of the area are left intact, it preserves the tree cover and associated wildlife and biodiversity in the area. 

     

  • At the information session last night, there was a station regarding fitness facility, recreation, etc. What would we like..... I am confused, as I was under the impression our new HUB was to offer a space for residents in this manner. Regardless, with an increase of approx 7000-9000 residents, there must be a consideration given to recreation facility for youth. I have more than once, heard Anmore South promoted as a great place for young families. A place for our firefighters and health-care workers. A place for families will need a place for recreation. The Port Moody facility already has Anmore residents lower priority for registration. There are many children who play soccer, hockey, lacrosse, dance, baseball, and more - all in tri-city leagues. Will Anmore South contribute facilities to accommodate families and their sports, to alleviate some of waitlist families currently struggle with in Port Moody?

    LisaJ asked 19 days ago

    As outlined in the OCP Amendment Application, a new proposed Community Centre positioned adjacent the mixed-use district at the east side of Anmore South is targeted at ~25,000 sq. ft on a 1-acre parcel. Inclusive and accessible, the Community Centre design would meet the needs of all members of the community, including youth, seniors and persons with disabilities. Within a 5-minute walk of Anmore Elementary, the proposed Community Centre would feature safe accessible pathways, seating areas, and public washrooms, all set within an integrated parks and trail network. The specific Community Centre program will be explored through the Neighbourhood Planning process and will be finalized as part of zoning.

  • Is either the Village of Anmore, or Icona able to confirm who in fact will actually develop the Anmore South lands, both the residential/commercial space and any additional offered recreational buildings, parkland, trails, etc. Who will develop the project as a whole. Icona currently has one project in Vancouver, however, does not have an extensive developer resume nor long builder history of proving the ability to take on a project of this magnitude. So this makes one wonder: Who will actually do the build? Does Icona commit to be the developer throughout the complete 25-year planned build-out? Do they commit to seeing whatever project is approved, though to completion? Or rather, is it Icona's sole intention to get approval? Is it the intention of Icona to change the OCP, gain acceptance and approval from the Village of Anmore as well as Metro Vancouver, then once approval is granted, sell the project to another company or developer? If another developer steps in once approval is granted, it is not uncommon for a developer to come back with amendments and various alternate requests which deviate from the original plans. Developers often request higher density as time goes on and housing needs increase. So in essence, it's likely, and quite possible that what we see as an application for 3500 units today, if approved actually becomes a much higher densified project in the future, possibly even doubling in size.

    LisaJ asked 19 days ago

    Like all property owners, the Applicant (icona) has the ability to develop or to sell their lands in accordance with the zoning and associated legal development agreement. Master-planned neighbourhoods often involve a master developer that manages the project through build-out, including the sale of individual serviced parcels to take advantage of specialized expertise, match the pace of absorption, and reduce financial risk.

    Should the Anmore South Neighbourhood Plan be adopted, it will become part of the Village’s Official Community Plan, and will it guide any future development. Any increase to the permitted units in the Neighbourhood Plan will require a new OCP Amendment Bylaw process along with community consultation.

  • I believe that there is a lot of confusion about Anmore South. However, the confusion is not about who Icona is, but who Anmore Council is representing. I am not trying to stop Council from following its timeline with Icona, but Council can and must independently discuss Anmore's future with Anmore citizens. While Council-hosted meetings are being spent discussing hypothetical scenarios for Icona, we are told that we cannot discuss the possibility of Icona using CD zoning because that would be hypothetical? CD zoning is available for Icona to use and has many of the benefits that people like about icona’s proposal (bring more people in, a variety of housing, etc.) without bringing in sewers and overpopulating Anmore. Citizens need to know that. If icona won't discuss it does that mean that Anmore is not allowed to talk about it? We are waiting to hear from our Council. Could you please explain the Public hearing. Why is it so far ahead in the proceedings and what form will it take?

    HKoit asked 18 days ago

    Thank you for your input. Residents are welcome to provide whatever input they like as part of the current community engagement. The Public Hearing takes place between 2nd and 3rd reading of the bylaw, which comes after the Neighbourhood Plan and any policy updates to the OCP are complete. For more information on the process, please see the graphic “Key Process and Decision Points” under the Planning Process tab.

  • If I had any respect for Icona and Village Council, it was lost when Icona suggested it was going RS1 just before the last election. Any development in this area should remain under rural guidelines. Going urban only increases the property values translating to more profits. Why is it so difficult for mayor and council to put their foot down and just say no?

    Wade asked 16 days ago

    Thank you for sharing your input on the Anmore South OCP Application and Neighbourhood Plan. We will include your input as part of the feedback to consider as we plan next steps in the process. Regarding the current process, please see some of the other responses here around Council's obligations and decision to consider the application. 

Page last updated: 02 Jul 2024, 12:22 PM